Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Font Size:
Onward, Ridiculous Debaters
Abstract
Round Table discussion on Theology and the Political: The New Debate, by Creston Davis, John Milbank & Slavoj Zizek, eds. (Duke University Press, 2005).
This article responds to Adam Kotsko’s counter-positioning of Thomast-Milbankian hierarchy on the one hand and Deleuzian-Surinian univocity on the other as competing visions for an ontologically grounded universal socialism. Pointing to Milbank’s declaration that it would be “ridiculous” to debate Christianity’s universality, Rubenstein raises suspicion about the ethical and political value of universality as such. Ultimately, she points to Jean- Luc Nancy’s notion of “sharing” as a means of relating existents that neither reconsolidates a static hierarchy nor abolishes transcendence. Rather, sharing “shares beings out,” clearing a space for genuine debate among those who are essentially different.
This article responds to Adam Kotsko’s counter-positioning of Thomast-Milbankian hierarchy on the one hand and Deleuzian-Surinian univocity on the other as competing visions for an ontologically grounded universal socialism. Pointing to Milbank’s declaration that it would be “ridiculous” to debate Christianity’s universality, Rubenstein raises suspicion about the ethical and political value of universality as such. Ultimately, she points to Jean- Luc Nancy’s notion of “sharing” as a means of relating existents that neither reconsolidates a static hierarchy nor abolishes transcendence. Rather, sharing “shares beings out,” clearing a space for genuine debate among those who are essentially different.