Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Font Size:
Poesis and Immediacy: A Reply to Davis
Abstract
Round Table discussion on Theology and the Political: The New Debate, by Creston Davis, John Milbank & Slavoj Zizek, eds. (Duke University Press, 2005).
It is argued here that the Christian doctrines of Trinity and creation make imperative the notion of “mediation” as God’s mode of existing in himself and toward us, as well as our mode of existence in God’s grace. This is the case in Saint Thomas’s account of grace, and it is also the basic configuration of Sergei Bulgakov’s sophiology. Josh Davis’s understanding of grace, by opting for immediacy as our mode of dependence on God, ultimately fails to give a full account of human cooperation, and in so doing establishes a competitive relation between human and divine agency.
It is argued here that the Christian doctrines of Trinity and creation make imperative the notion of “mediation” as God’s mode of existing in himself and toward us, as well as our mode of existence in God’s grace. This is the case in Saint Thomas’s account of grace, and it is also the basic configuration of Sergei Bulgakov’s sophiology. Josh Davis’s understanding of grace, by opting for immediacy as our mode of dependence on God, ultimately fails to give a full account of human cooperation, and in so doing establishes a competitive relation between human and divine agency.